Therefore (generator: ["strictequal1@trueknowledge.com"]):
polar bear
is not strictly equal to
consumer
I know from locally stored knowledge that:
polar bear
is a subclass of
non-human organism
([fact: ["230144198@trueknowledge.com"]])
polar bear
is a subclass of
Ursus
([fact: ["130986121@trueknowledge.com"]])
polar bear
is a subclass of
eukaryote
([fact: ["130986127@trueknowledge.com"]])
polar bear
is a subclass of
bear
([fact: ["130986122@trueknowledge.com"]])
polar bear
is a subclass of
chordate
([fact: ["130986125@trueknowledge.com"]])
polar bear
is a subclass of
organism
([fact: ["137146444@trueknowledge.com"]])
polar bear
is a subclass of
Carnivora
([fact: ["130986123@trueknowledge.com"]])
polar bear
is a subclass of
non-human animal
([fact: ["1006191622@trueknowledge.com"]])
polar bear
is a subclass of
non-human mammal
([fact: ["137356587@trueknowledge.com"]])
polar bear
is a subclass of
mammal
([fact: ["130986124@trueknowledge.com"]])
polar bear
is a subclass of
animal
([fact: ["130986126@trueknowledge.com"]])
consumer
is a subclass of
person
([fact: ["129157926@trueknowledge.com"]])
bear
is a distinct class from
person
([fact: ["243035486@trueknowledge.com"]])
By calculation (generator: ["distinct_interleave@trueknowledge.com"]) I know that:
polar bear
is a distinct class from
consumer
Therefore (generator: ["subclassdistinct1@trueknowledge.com"]):
polar bear
is not a subclass of
consumer
Therefore (generator: ["not_same_as_or_subclass@trueknowledge.com"]):
polar bear
is not the same as or a subclass of
consumer