Therefore (generator: ["strictequal1@trueknowledge.com"]):
locust
is not strictly equal to
cannibal
I know from locally stored knowledge that:
locust
is a subclass of
Hexapoda
([fact: ["1047263038@trueknowledge.com"]])
locust
is a subclass of
Orthoptera
([fact: ["644500592@trueknowledge.com"]])
locust
is a subclass of
Acrididae
([fact: ["130988891@trueknowledge.com"]])
locust
is a subclass of
eukaryote
([fact: ["1079423842@trueknowledge.com"]])
locust
is a subclass of
Hexapoda
([fact: ["130988893@trueknowledge.com"]])
locust
is a subclass of
arthropod
([fact: ["130988894@trueknowledge.com"]])
locust
is a subclass of
non-human animal
([fact: ["1079423838@trueknowledge.com"]])
locust
is a subclass of
insect
([fact: ["130988892@trueknowledge.com"]])
locust
is a subclass of
animal
([fact: ["130988895@trueknowledge.com"]])
cannibal
is a subclass of
person
([fact: ["375590543@trueknowledge.com"]])
non-human animal
is a distinct class from
person
([fact: ["243035958@trueknowledge.com"]])
By calculation (generator: ["distinct_interleave@trueknowledge.com"]) I know that:
locust
is a distinct class from
cannibal
Therefore (generator: ["subclassdistinct1@trueknowledge.com"]):
locust
is not a subclass of
cannibal
Therefore (generator: ["not_same_as_or_subclass@trueknowledge.com"]):
locust
is not the same as or a subclass of
cannibal
Facts
Show facts
